Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Estufa principal do Jardim Botânico de Curitiba 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Estufa principal do Jardim Botânico de Curitiba 02.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2019 at 10:30:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created and uploaded by Rodrigo.Argenton - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 10:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 10:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)- Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 10:56, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Even though it is in a botanical garden, the building looks too small compared to the flower bed in the foreground. Flowers rarely look good in dusky or dark photos. --Cart (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)- Support It's OK for me, I like the contrast between the red building and the blueish sky. Cmao20 (talk) 12:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Neutral This one per Cart but I still don't want to oppose it yet. --BoothSift 22:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)- Oppose - No wow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose the background buildings and objects to the left and right of the main building are too distracting – Lucas 06:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. --Yann (talk) 05:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support For me, too --Llez (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not just per Cart. I can understand why the photographer wanted to use a long exposure; however I think it outsmarted itself. The building looks like it's on fire or about to melt, probably not the desired effect, and the clouds are distracting. The whole effect is of a photograph that doesn't know what it wants to be when it grows up. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, the "photographer" (Rodrigo) here, well I pretty much now what I want, and what I want when I grow up... nothing that matters to this evaluation.
- But, just to explain for the others, first it was dark and this is a Kiss X7, a noisy entry level camera, so long exposure was a necessity.
- Second, I wanted more DOF, without stacking a lot of photos (also because of the next reason)
- And finally, the most important, to remove the people around the building, that you even notice, but they were a lot, I mean a lot:i.e., i.e., of people, especially in the light events.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton, you misunderstood Daniel. He is talking about the photo growing up, not you. It is a metaphor that can easily get "lost in translation". --Cart (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /– Lucas 17:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
