Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Epipedobates-tricolor-dreistreifen-baumsteiger.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Epipedobates-tricolor-dreistreifen-baumsteiger.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2011 at 12:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Citron (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Composition could be better but I like it. ■ MMXX talk 12:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support--Georgez (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and detailed. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Gamaliel (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Raghith 05:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Suraj T 08:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Cephas (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry to spoil the fun, but I have a lot of problems with this. Firstly it would be more obvious to me that this is in a natural setting if the background hadn't been so blurred - it's a very unrealistic effect, at least for my eyes. The frog couldn't have been more than a couple feet off the ground, yet it's totally blurry just a couple of inches from where it is? Usually if you're looking at something (and are fortunate enough to still have good vision) and somethings just a few feet from it and unobscured the things in the background should be fairly sharp. I supposed this trick was employed because FPC is still to understand that there is such a thing as too much lead room and it would be impossible to crop out the leaf to the right, but I think I would've preferred normal sharpness, even if it attracted "no wow"s. Also the direct overhead lighting is bad. It's unrealistic because frogs are pretty timid and don't go under direct light often. It gives away that this was taken in a zoo (the frog must feel safe there). -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice subject but very harsh lighting. Overall I'm not convinced by this image. -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 10:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose As opponents above. --Karelj (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose as Karelj --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 10:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support It is hard to get good pictures of frogs without a flash. I think this is a valuable and quality image of a striking subject. --99of9 (talk) 05:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians