Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg

File:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 11:51:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg

•  Info created by anonymous - uploaded by Cla68 - nominated by Nanae -- Nanae (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support historical value, featured picture on the English and Spanish language wikipedias, valued image on Commons-- Nanae (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality. —kallerna™ 15:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe a valued image but not a featured one. --High Contrast (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support It may not be excellent quality, but how often do you get a picture like this? It is also featured on EnWiki and EsWiki. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special here. --Mile (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Nothing special!? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Dramatic moment, historical image; we can't expect pictures from 70 years ago to have been taken with a modern digital camera. Jayen466 06:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Poor quality??? Yes, maybe with a tripod this image could be have better quality. Dear anonymous, can you retry to take images like this? Maybe with different views? --Cesco77 (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Historic and encyclopedic. Takabeg (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Per Takabeg --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Nothing special? How many photographs of a man climbing an aircraft on fire do we have? Wow. Jonathunder (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Jayen466. Yes, the quality is not high by today's standards, but the important details are clear enough.--Avenue (talk) 04:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Per Takabeg, plus that it's a very good idea. --патриот8790 (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 17:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Tiptoety ^talk 01:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical