Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eisbär.JPG

File:Eisbär.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2010 at 14:11:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eisbär.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eisbär.JPG

•  Info created by powerhauer - uploaded by powerhauer - nominated by powerhauer -- Powerhauer (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Powerhauer (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition, but rather noisy, and the corners are to dark. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Poor quality--Mbz1 (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  Weak support(if I can do that when contesting FPX) Mostly just needs white balancing and tweaking, otherwise I don't think it's disqualifyingly terrible. --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Mila, were you not in favour of getting rid of FPX? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I was, but it was really hard for me to look at that poor bear (I saw dozens of them in a wild), at his yellow fur, and a sick look. Polar bears are beautiful animals, and this one... it looks like he is in pain. Anyway you are right. I let my personal feelings about this poor caged bear to prevail. Sorry about this.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Nothing to be sorry about! I agree that ethics is a factor to [polar!] bear in mind when considering FPC - MPF (talk) 09:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, nothing wrong with having ethics, and it could be argued anyway that if someone was going to take a zoo photo it could show the animal more interesting than just sitting there. This one looks more lazy than like he's suffering to me, though. --IdLoveOne (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose - un-natural background - MPF (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Love the composition, but the color seems unnatural. Pretty, but the not the best educational photo. Steven Walling 00:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon (talk) 11:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --Ghabara (talk) 22:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor quality, composition seems unnatural Cathy Richards (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)