Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ecuador - Panoramica Antisana Sincholagua Cotopaxi Corazon Ilinizas.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ecuador - Panoramica Antisana Sincholagua Cotopaxi Corazon Ilinizas.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2011 at 21:47:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Martini - uploaded by Martini - nominated by David C. S. -- David C. S. 21:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- David C. S.
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Oversharpened, trivial composition, curved horizon. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure about other criterias, but the curved horizon for such a big pano should not be a problem. The earth is not flat, isn't? ;o)
- It is not flat but not that curved. The curved horizon is consequence of bad projection during de making of the panorama.
- Yes, I know that the earth cannot look that much curved from down here, but only from space. Yann (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is not flat but not that curved. The curved horizon is consequence of bad projection during de making of the panorama.
- I am not sure about other criterias, but the curved horizon for such a big pano should not be a problem. The earth is not flat, isn't? ;o)
- Oppose As Alvesgaspar. --Karelj (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I have no problem with the curvature; it does seem more pronounced than one would expect from the curvature of the earth alone, but may simply be due to local geography. Unfortunately this is not FP quality. Severe stitching errors, dust/water mark on bottom left corner, chromatic aberration and I suspect not the best composition that the location had to offer. If you do however have the opportunity to photograph there again, please do. The location can definitely make for an excellent panorama. --NJR_ZA (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)