Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dom Berlin 01.JPG

File:Dom Berlin 01.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2011 at 06:13:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dom Berlin 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dom Berlin 01.JPG

•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor quality (unsharp, compression artifacts) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes quality is not so good. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice, but the quality isn't good enough for FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC) After Benh's question and comment --Llez (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Question Would you share what settings and processing was done to achieve this ? I think it really has the potential for FP, but I wonder how it ended up this soft. - Benh (talk) 11:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
  •  Info It is the ceiling of an arch, about as this [1], and this was also the form of the original. The correction to right angle was done by using the perspective correction of photoshop elements successively several times (It was not possible to do the correction in one step because of the strong curvature). --Llez (talk) 20:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks. In my opinion, the curved surface is a mitigating reason, and the votes were a bit unfair. Would be worth nominating it again in the future. - Benh (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support quality isn't so bad, and it was nicely perspective fixed imo (it's a curved surface) - Benh (talk) 20:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)