Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crepuscular rays over parc de Noisiel at sunrise, 26 May 2019.jpg

File:Crepuscular rays over parc de Noisiel at sunrise, 26 May 2019.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 06:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Crepuscular rays over parc de Noisiel at sunrise, 26 May 2019.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crepuscular rays over parc de Noisiel at sunrise, 26 May 2019.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
•  Info created by Benh - uploaded by B2Belgium - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Fantastic light. --Cart (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Light, composition. -- Colin (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Colin and Cart, this is excellent work. Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see every day horizontal rays over a well composed natural landscape and all that seeing from above. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Steindy (talk) 21:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support It's like buttah. Looks like something you'd see in an airline ad. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 07:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support this is the miracle of light. Ahmad^talk 12:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Wonderful light, but IMO sharpness could be better. Why only f/3.2? Why 1/2.000 s? --XRay ^talk 12:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

• @XRay: Thank you for the review. Yes sharpness could be much better. The camera on the Mavic 2 pro is everything but stellar. It's pretty good, but nothing compared to the 1" Sony RX100 series for example (lens-wise and sensor-wise). To be honest, I didn't really plan this shot. It was more or less a test flight and that beautiful light was unexpected. But f/3.2 is pretty good for a lens this big. I would say we're not far from the sweet spot here. Stop it down and diffraction start to affect the image (because it's not the relative aperture, but the absolute aperture which affects the quality). 1/2000 is probably because I did the metering on the sun. Again, test flight... The pic came out very dark, so I had to push the EV up (hence the noise). - Benh (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Sun