Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common Starling in Wormwood Scrubs Park in spring 2013.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Common Starling in Wormwood Scrubs Park in spring 2013.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2013 at 17:47:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)- Support --Ladislav Faigl (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Oppose unfortunately missing the feet --Böhringer (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Comment Hi Böhringer, yes he is missing feet but he stand in the grass :) This is what one would expect from such as composition/situation. If levitated, it would be strange (or if I'll chop grass before shot) :)) Anyway thanks for voting and best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose It's very small in the image, or, if cropped, not quite sharp enough for FP status in my opinion. Also, while I don't necessarily miss the feet, I do find the surroundings relatively distracting. Light and the resulting contrasts are quite harsh. Overall, I just don't see anything extraordinary. --Julian H. (talk/files) 21:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support--Earth100 (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose below the bird bar. Tomer T (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per as Julian. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Featured for me, the focus is OK and the position of the bird is according to rule of thirds. — Draceane diskuse 20:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad quality.Trongphu (talk) 22:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel the light is too harsh and the image not very sharp. I would probably supported if it was an uncommon/difficult-to-photograph bird. -- ~y (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
