Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Claustro mudéjar de la Iglesia de San Pedro, Teruel, Aragón, España - 20090426.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Claustro mudéjar de la Iglesia de San Pedro, Teruel, Aragón, España - 20090426.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2011 at 22:32:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by José Luis Mieza - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Snaevar -- Snaevar (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)- Strong
Oppose. Improbable. Extreme processing. Nonartistic for me--Miguel Bugallo 00:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 
Support IMO post-processing photos shouldn't disqualify them from being featured! -- Marmoulak (talk) 02:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)- Oppose Post-processing photos does not disqualify them from being featured. This nonsensical kind of pseudo-HDRization does. I would have supported Miguel had he FPX'd this candidate. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Info Photos can be processed, in that case appropriate Template should be added. --Mile (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose imho this pseudo hdr look is not appropriate in a encyclopedia --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support I really like the overall effect. --TFCforever (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose unreal --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Enhanced beauty, not the real one......Captain......Tälk tö me.. 08:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose flickr kitsch. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- To me, after reading the full exif data, I belive the image looks that way becouse of camera settnings, but not any restoration, and that the high saturation is one of them. None the less, this picture can´t possibly be featured, so
I withdraw my nomination.--Snaevar (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
