Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christ the Redeemer edit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Christ the Redeemer edit.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2011 at 15:55:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ILYES - uploaded by User:Felipe Menegaz - nominated by Rodrigogomesonetwo -- Rodrigogomesonetwo (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Rodrigogomesonetwo (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Neutral The viewpoint is unexpected. Looking up to the statue might be symbolic and quite surely it´s only possible to take a straight view on picture of the statue in a helicopter or at great distances. What makes me put a neutral vote however, is the noise/stains on the statue and the statue platform, seen in full resolution.--Snaevar (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)- Support I kind of like the composition: How Jesus appears to be mightier than the sun or like he's going to embrace it, it seems like an artistic choice in step with the religion, which I personally don't mind. Would be better if the sky wasn't so boring, a cloud or two.. The lens might not have been right though, almost seems the sunlight is too strong some places, but not enough for me to oppose this. --IdLoveOne (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose -- Terrible image quality, with extensive chromatic noise and blurriness caused by a denoising filter. A clear FPX case. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)- Oppose per Alvesgaspar. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:05, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - noise/denoise... -- Felix König ✉ 19:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Tamba52 (talk) 08:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective not convincing. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting, but does not show the statue well. Snowmanradio (talk) 14:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Not good perspective, wrong angle. --Karelj (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose--shizhao (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
