Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 04.jpg

File:Castillo de Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2018 at 21:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 04.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
•  Info Remains of the casle of Montuenga, a fortification of the 11th century located in Montuenga de Soria, Province of Soria, Spain. All by me, 21:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - the power transmission line is a bit distracting, but very impressive otherwise. --СССР (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Very clean lines, but I would crop the right side further in - probably just a bit to the right of the pylon, but I think you could obviate complaints about it by cropping to its left, and that'll still look good and IMO better than the current crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

  Ikan: I played around with the crop but I came to the conclusion that it's ok like this. Cropping the right side would break the golden ratio and the castle would be almost centered. Poco² 18:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

• It wouldn't look almost centered (not that I think there's any inherent problem with that) because of the slope on the left. I will remain  Neutral, I think, because there's a certain austere character to the photo as it is, but I haven't changed my mind that a good crop would improve the composition quite substantially. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support awesome. Any chance to clone out the power lines & pylon? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, this evening will definitely clone that out and think about the crop --Poco² 07:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

  @СССР, Ikan Kekek, and Martin Falbisoner:  Done I've cloned out the power post and lines. --Poco² 18:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose vibrance, staruation is above my taste. --Mile (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Is that the original blue? Looks too saturated. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

  BeckenhamBear: Original is hard to say, but that's the standard blue in all such images. I come from that region and it doesn't look unreal to me, but as it is the second voice in that direction I've reduced the saturation a bit --Poco² 20:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment I only asked. I have seen such blue before. I will lend my support for this image with "accurate" colour rendition. I don't mind the image being tweaked to portray real colours as seen knowing full well that film chemistry or the camera software can tell lies. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 12:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

  BeckenhamBear:I haven't understood your point, was the reduction of saturation fine for you or did it fall too short? Poco² 21:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications