Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bury Parish Church HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bury Parish Church HDR.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2013 at 11:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created & uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Wonderfully done. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support I'm not a fan of HDR but it works here. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support nice--David1010 08:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Great subject and composition (I specially like the floor mosaic) but not really sharp and lacking a perspective correction Poco2 09:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice but perspective issues Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others.--Jebulon (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose it needs perspective correction. --Vamps (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Support Sigh. Yet again this obsession with "correcting" perspective and pixel-peeping an 18MP image. The minimum requirements for Commons FP are 2MP and this image had 3x that linear resolution. So try reducing the image 50% with a little sharpening and your sharpness issues will disappear and it will still be well above the minimum requirements. If the perspective was "corrected" in this image, the nearest side windows and columns would be cropped out and you'd lose this framing device. The photo required a 10mm lens on an APS-C camera, so this is at the boundary of what one could expect a rectilinear image could produce without distortion. It is not at all easy to capture a building such as this, with dark interior and bright stained-glass. Well done. Colin (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Colin. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 12:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs perspective correction. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support please don't distort this photo. --Ralf Roleček 11:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Perspective distortion is acceptable. I'd like a bit more of contrast on small details but I guess that's a HDR "issue". --Kadellar (talk) 12:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think that a perspective correction would improve this image, as it is too strongly distorted at the sides. For the same reason, however, I cannot accept it as FP. --A.Savin 21:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Very nice photo; if anything, it'd benefit from some levels adjusting for better contrast -- there is a lack of dark tones and a bit too much levels left on light end for just some tiny differences. Amadvr (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support M49314 (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors