Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bordeaux place de la bourse with tram.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bordeaux place de la bourse with tram.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2010 at 18:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by nikopol- nominated by Barun -- Barun (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Barun (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Promising in low size, but slightly deceptive in full res (sharpness, dynamic range...) --MAURILBERT (discuter) 19:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)- Support A bit noisy, but nice. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose. Tilted, technical deficits. Subject looks great and shows clear potential for an FP. But this is not it. --Dschwen (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)- Support great!--Luc Viatour (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical problems, per Dschwen. Steven Walling 21:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral Per Maurilbert, he said exactly what I think--Jebulon (talk) 23:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment Building on the left is sharp; maybe effects of distortion by thermal convection currents in the rest of the scene? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)- Oppose - a daytime shot would be much nicer - MPF (talk) 11:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Very poor quality. Fortunately it is possible to do much better even under these difficult conditions. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dschwen. --AngMoKio (talk) 22:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support - There seems little reason to oppose this nomination for me. To say 'a daytime shot would have been nicer' hardly constitutes a reason. Still I suppose its largely personal preferences.Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
