Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergweg tussen Andiast, Ladinas en Breil-Brigels (actm) 16.jpg

File:Bergweg tussen Andiast, Ladinas en Breil-Brigels (actm) 16.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2019 at 16:40:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bergweg tussen Andiast, Ladinas en Breil-Brigels (actm) 16.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergweg tussen Andiast, Ladinas en Breil-Brigels (actm) 16.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural #Switserland.
•  Info A small artificial lake, beautifully situated in the Graubünder alps.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 17:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose A QI for sure, but as an FP it doesn't work ... we have the hazed mountains in the background, and this oddly-cropped half of a waterbody in front. Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- even better Seven Pandas (talk) 19:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is too static, with no foreground interest to lead the viewer into the center of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per KoH. Also I don't think this is the most picturesque subject (artificial lake, concrete) when we have beautiful alps all around. -- Colin (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Looks like he accidentally voted twice.Seven Pandas (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

True, and that makes a difference, I had to strike it through...--Poco² 19:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)