Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo male female.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo male female.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2009 at 18:35:16
- Info c/u/n by • Richard • [®] • 18:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Info For me this pictures is a tiny sensation with lots of value - It shows a male (left) and a female (right) of the Beautiful Demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo) in a direct comparison.
- Support -- • Richard • [®] • 18:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
SupportOpposeIs she chasing him? ;-)Switch to oppose due to errors. Maedin\talk 18:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not really. She was laying eggs before and he watched/observed that very carefully. Every once in a while they took a rest, mostly not together - but in a rare moment ... "click" • Richard • [®] • 18:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Aw, :-) That does sound like a tiny sensation with lots of value! Maedin\talk 18:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Not the best, but very good --kaʁstn 19:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful indeed. Focus stack? --Muhammad (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Lycaon (talk) 07:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- RBID (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason? -- Pro2 (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Probably for the many stitching errors. File:Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo male female errors.jpg --Fir0002 www 23:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not another case of the loving wrens? File:Superb fairy wrens mark 2.jpg ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Probably for the many stitching errors. File:Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo male female errors.jpg --Fir0002 www 23:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- as per RBID --Lucash (talk) 17:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per Fir0002 -- Pro2 (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per Fir0002 - good catch. --Yerpo (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose due to stitching errors. -- Ram-Man 02:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per Fir0002 --George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Is this real? --Estrilda (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, it's a 3d rendering • Richard • [®] • 22:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose unfortunate stitch errors --ianaré (talk) 01:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)