Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg

File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2015 at 10:46:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info UNESCO World heritage site Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics. All by --Mile (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I will not stop me for technical quality analysis because the first thing I thought when I opened the page, it's wow. And I will stay on that. -- Christian Ferrer 11:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good! --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support It definitely gave "WOW" when opening the page, but I think that dark right corner is quite problematic as you can barely see anything in that part of the picture. -- Pofka (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support as Pofka --Hubertl (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose The subject has wow to me and the quality is good, but the composition is a bit awkward, it would have probably worked out if there had been a symmetry on both sides but it isn't. The top right area is also too dark Poco² 08:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

  Moving to  Neutral after improvement of dark area Poco² 17:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose The shadow area at the upper right ruins the composition. --Laitche (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Dark part enligthened (@Laitche, Poc). --Mile (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Could you check with Photoshop that there is no (or no problematic) out-of-gamut issues with saving this as sRGB instead. If you can, that would help make this image display with the correct colours for most users with desktop and mobile browsers. -- Colin (talk) 11:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Done No issues. --Mile (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

• Weak  Support Nice pic. I guess a bit overprocessing and CAs on the windows at the bottom left but acceptable to me. --Laitche (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors