Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Armavia Sukhoi Superjet Heisterkamp.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Armavia Sukhoi Superjet Heisterkamp.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2011 at 20:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Eddie Heisterkamp - uploaded by Eddie Heisterkamp - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- russavia (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I have introduced Eddie to Commons, and he has provided the photo in higher resolution and with less cropping -- perfect IMO. I am providing a link to this discussion to Eddie, and he will be taking note of any comments being made. Feel free to ask him any questions, and be nice to him. :) russavia (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- with less cropping - and for this reason I support. be nice to him - erm... Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- BTW: was a polarizing filter used? Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice ■ MMXX talk 00:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Don-kun (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support I like the quality and crop. This one shows the standards of aviation photography very well Bushman787 (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sorry, good quality but nothing special. A tons of such photos can be found at airliners.net --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- I would somewhat disagree. The "tons" of photos on a.net are not nessarily 1) available in required resolution; 2) cropped in such a way that makes them suitable for FP on Commons; 3) freely licenced; and 4) most importantly, available on Commons. russavia (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Could you please add a little more space in the front of the plane? I will support with that. Yann (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yann, could you perhaps drop a note for Eddie on his talk page. He isn't going to be online until Sunday (I think he said) -- at least then he should receive notification on email. russavia (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Albertus teolog (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- As noted above, there is nothing extraordinary in this picture justifying the FP seal. The plane looks caged inside the frame. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per above - Benh (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose a very good QI image, but not a FP for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose as Alvesgaspar. พ.s. 11:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support for its category this image has high quality and it is featurable. More space to the right (may-be by cloning job) can enhance the image.. not being centred and being a little bit more balanced. Ggia (talk) 08:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose many small things add up: bit too tight crop on the right, airline name obscured, uninteresting background. Good quality and useful image but not FP for me. --ELEKHHT 12:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose good quality, but not Feature Picture.--David საქართველო 13:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC)