Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea herodias standing on a rock at St. Pete Beach.JPG

File:Ardea herodias standing on a rock at St. Pete Beach.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2019 at 21:26:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea herodias standing on a rock at St. Pete Beach.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea herodias standing on a rock at St. Pete Beach.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes
•  Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 21:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- grendel|khan 21:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing to say against showing an animal in its natural environment, but in this case the subject is not well separated from the background without any need for it (IMHO), making it harder to see the quite interesting silouette of the bird. The worst part are feathers on the bottom of its beak that are of very similar tone as the water reflections behind it. E.g. a lower angle would have cleared the background up a lot and provided more presence. – Lucas^T 21:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lucas. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Quite good IMHO. Yann (talk) 07:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Yann. The fact that the background is somewhat blurred gives sufficient separation, and the bird is quite well captured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cannot compete with the many Ardea FPs. Charles (talk) 11:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per others - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lucas - for an FP the detail quality of feathers and beak is imho not sufficient. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lucas --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lucas -- Karelj (talk) 09:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan Kekek. She animates (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

• Invalid vote. The guidelines state "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote.". This account has been created yesterday and this is only the second edit -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)