Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ArcTriompheParis.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:ArcTriompheParis.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 12:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Cimosteve - uploaded by Cimosteve - nominated by Cimosteve -- Cimosteve (talk) 12:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Cimosteve (talk) 12:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Technically insufficient in many aspects. --Dschwen (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Poor quality, and there seem to be traces of panoramic merging (such as abrupt colour changes). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Traces?!! That is the understatement of the year. There is no "panoramic merging". This image is an utter mess, Verticals are dancing all over the place, there is no attempt whatsoever to conceal the misfits between the images. --Dschwen (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, though I might've perhaps phrased it a little more diplomatically. Cimosteve: If you were to make the originals available somewhere, I or someone else in Category:Commons users able to stitch images could try to fix the stitching problems. I can't guarantee that the result still would be FP quality, but at least some of the more obvious issues should be fixable easily enough. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Ilmari Karonen It's not so easy to stitch a picture like that I have 33 shots and unlikely on the arc the thriomphe in Paris it's not possible to take the shots from only one place, I will load the originals in raw format on a FTP server "over 3GB" and I tell you the url, it will take some time to upload. Thanks guys for your interest ;-) . --Cimosteve (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- 33 shots isn't all that many. I completely agree that it is touch to avoid parallax effects on the AdT, it would help to take even more images and careful always shoot exactly away from the center of the arc. Not using a stitching program that plain sucks would be a plus too. --Dschwen (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Ilmari Karonen It's not so easy to stitch a picture like that I have 33 shots and unlikely on the arc the thriomphe in Paris it's not possible to take the shots from only one place, I will load the originals in raw format on a FTP server "over 3GB" and I tell you the url, it will take some time to upload. Thanks guys for your interest ;-) . --Cimosteve (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, though I might've perhaps phrased it a little more diplomatically. Cimosteve: If you were to make the originals available somewhere, I or someone else in Category:Commons users able to stitch images could try to fix the stitching problems. I can't guarantee that the result still would be FP quality, but at least some of the more obvious issues should be fixable easily enough. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Traces?!! That is the understatement of the year. There is no "panoramic merging". This image is an utter mess, Verticals are dancing all over the place, there is no attempt whatsoever to conceal the misfits between the images. --Dschwen (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of very poor technical quality: lighting, sharpness, geometry, stitching -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
