Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apollo11-moon-mission.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Apollo11-moon-mission.png, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2012 at 19:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Soerfm - nominated by Soerfm -- Soerfm (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Soerfm (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Oppose The image annotations are good. Valuable. But it has been downsampled a lot after making the grid alignment of the original images leading to unecessary loss of detail. Moreover, for me the b&w graphics and the grid composition does not work so well for me. --Slaunger (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Info Yes, I forgot to say that the images are sampled from the gallery Apollo 11 flight where they are better seen; however I don't know how to nominate a gallery that is why I chose this. Soerfm (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I see, but in the process of making the composite from the individual images, the resulting image has been downsampled significantly (basically every four pixels in the original has been merged to one). And that is a pity as information and details are then being thrown away, when there is no reason to do so. --Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- The question is perhaps: should I nominate the gallery instead? Soerfm (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that would be a better idea. Look for the headline Set nominations in the guideline. It is only very rarely used, and I do not know how you actually set it up. I doubt the FPC bot can handle a set nomination, for example. Alternatively, you may want to try as a Valued image set candidate, see also COM:VICR. This process works (with some manual assistance) for image sets. --Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I think I'll try the Value image set candidate solution. Soerfm (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
