Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Albert Bierstadt - Among the Sierra Nevada, California - Google Art Project.jpg

File:Albert Bierstadt - Among the Sierra Nevada, California - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2016 at 08:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Albert Bierstadt - Among the Sierra Nevada, California - Google Art Project.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Albert Bierstadt - Among the Sierra Nevada, California - Google Art Project.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by Albert Bierstadt - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 08:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 08:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 08:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Question Should we feature all the Google Art Project pictures ? I don't understand.--Jebulon (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  • In the next ten years, the POTY contests will be won by Google-Art-Pictures. They are so wonderful dramatic. --Hubertl 14:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Assuming you're being sarcastic, you should note that despite Google Art Project images having been among the potential PotY nominees for several years running, none of them have ever even been a finalist (another argument, IMO, for treating art digitizations separately). Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

• • If they meet the criteria, why not? Firebrace (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Maybe not all of them but think about it this way: Which would you like to see introduced among the paintings when you browse through the featured picture pages? Which of the painting documentations do justice to the original work the best, which of the paintings are the finest examples of certain styles or which do you find aesthetically most pleasing (just like the photographs)? If the best document was from Google it doesn't make the work less valuable imo. --Ximonic (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  • no problem with Google, and I'm happy we have these pictures in " Commons". But I don't understand the need of the fp star here. So, following the arguments here, let's automatically feature all the GAP pictures, we will waste less time.--Jebulon (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Too small for a landscape painting (1.8 x 3 m). And nobody saw the black border at right?--Claus 18:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you for noticing that border. I have cropped it out. --Pine^✉ 19:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
• Realistically, it will be years, maybe even decades, before a larger photo of this painting is made available to the Commons. Are we really going to wait? Firebrace (talk) 01:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent --The Photographer (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media