Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9248.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9248.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2016 at 20:02:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Unfortunately, The Photographer, this shown asymmetry is not in my competence, Mr. Pozzo is no longer accessible (he died 1709) to ask him why he has painted this dome such asymmetrical. In fact, there is one position in this church, were this perspective looks natural. Not easy to find, you see it from the entrance, the first impression of the church. It´s a so called Trompe-l'œil-fresco --Hubertl 06:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My notes are not about painting, notes are about architecture and architecture can not be asymmetrical and my note from the center shows that the four corners of the columns are not aligned IMHO :) --The Photographer (talk) 12:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The Photographer the note please in the nomination page,thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
symmetry and others problem can't be showed in a small thumbnail. I add the notes on full image page always. --The Photographer (talk) 01:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, but a building, which was erected in the 1620th and rebuild 70 years later - using the base of the older chapel - can´t and won´t be perfectly straight. Why was it necessary to renovate it in the late 19th century? Even in my appartment, which is just 100 years old, you won´t find a straight wall, even when the original floor plan say so. If you want something perfectly straight, try a pre-fabricated house construction - hoping, every part will fit perfectly with the other. In fact, it won´t. How much do you think does a building expands in summer and shrinks in winter - more in the south, less in the north parts - without any damages? If you make a diagonal measuring in such a church which is not a very big one compared to others, you will find a difference of one-half to one meter, maybe more. How come? I've just done a measurement in my private office room here, 4x5 m, the difference is 12cm. This only in one room, not over the entire apartment. All angles should have exactly 90°. Forget it! --Hubertl 17:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for your comment, when you try to correct the asymmetry assumed that other errors were problems of photography and not a architecture symmetry problem. Please, I invite you to revert the "fix", btw, I invite you yo read [Symmetry in Architecture http://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/vismath/kim/index.html] --The Photographer (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings