Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG

File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2013 at 15:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 04.JPG

•  Info Unusual perspective of the BMW Tower (known as "4 Cylinders"), host of the BMW Group headquarters, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support An interesting architectural image. There is slight distortion of the horizontal panels and facade band near the bottom of the image but I think it is acceptable. Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

  I made some improvements in the perspective and chose a new crop Poco a poco (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not as interesting as your previous FP. JKadavoor Jee 06:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's more interesting. Tomer T (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice perspective. --Selbymay (talk) 08:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice perspective and interesting --The Photographer (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support ... and well done.--Jebulon (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately it is difficult to identify the building in question so I find the educational value of a nondescript building hard to warrant a FP, while the sky is a bit too flat. No wow here. —Mono 19:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agrees with Jkadavoor and Mono. It's very hard to recognize. --관인생략 (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose As other opponents. --Karelj (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--JT Curses (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose One doesn't learn much about the building, it's too disjointed from the whole, and the image looks monotone. Hekerui (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I like the symmetry. The other FP might be more encyclopaedic but this one has a more original composition. It also serves to explain the vanishing point. --Kadellar (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition; well done overall. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture