Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019 - Wiener Karlskirche mit Teich und "Hill Arches" Skulptur am Abend.jpg

File:2019 - Wiener Karlskirche mit Teich und "Hill Arches" Skulptur am Abend.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 21:56:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2019 - Wiener Karlskirche mit Teich und "Hill Arches" Skulptur am Abend.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019 - Wiener Karlskirche mit Teich und "Hill Arches" Skulptur am Abend.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
•  Info created by and uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Boothsift -- Boothsift 21:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Boothsift 21:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition. Good quality too. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great mirror effect, special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral sorry but while this is a great photo, it's processed with Adobe, and they just haven't figured out how to do demosaicing on Fuji data. They are notorious for their water color effects. Here, it shows quite well on the columns where the details are lost (and it would probably be more obvious had it been left full 26mpix size and not 15mpix). - Benh (talk) 07:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition and light. I agree it is not fully sharp at 100% but possibly due to long exposure (4s) rather than camera? A little sharpening, combined with a sharpening mask to avoid noise in the sky, might help. -- Colin (talk) 11:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

• Capture was done right. It's the demosaicing which is wrong here. If user has the raw, he can reprocess (with everything but adobe products). - Benh (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Support been there, tried that, failed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 14:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely reflections; not quite sharp, but the text is clearly visible above the entrance of the building. Shame about the graffiti on the right-hand side though. Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - If it could be improved, great, but it's already an FP to me per others, mainly because of the light and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria