Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017.04.21.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg

File:2017.04.21.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2019 at 08:24:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2017.04.21.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017.04.21.-03-Mannheim Vogelstang--Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hockei (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks over saturated to me. -- Colin (talk) 15:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose 5 few years ago I've photographed also a Gamander Ehrenpreis, see: File:Gamander-Ehrenpreis.jpg. I think the detail quality of the nomineee here is not sufficient for an FP (compare with my photo). In 100% view the photo here looks somehow overprocessed, especially at the edge of the flower. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I do not know the picture of Tuxyso and at the moment I only view this candidate. The blossom is very detailed and sharp. And I like this composition with a sharp main focus and blurred rest. --Tozina (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin; it seems too saturated for me. Sorry. Tournasol7 (talk) 00:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Saturation doesn't bother me so much (unsurprising) but it is horribly overprocessed ... just look at the edges of the petals. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Info Daniel, I've reworked it. However, without changing the saturation. This saturation isn't more adjusted than in my other pictures too and I love it. Hope it's good now. --Hockei (talk) 16:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Info @MZaplotnik, Seven Pandas, Tozina, and Yann: You should take another look in order to see if you still like it because of my reworking. Thanks. --Hockei (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2019 (UTC)