Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20020800 Chora Samothrace island Thrace Greece.jpg

File:20020800 Chora Samothrace island Thrace Greece.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 07:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:20020800 Chora Samothrace island Thrace Greece.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20020800 Chora Samothrace island Thrace Greece.jpg

•  Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ggia (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment scanned image from slide film (fuji sensia 100asa), has aprox. 36megapixels resolution due to hi-res scan. Ggia (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment [1] this photo is not a low quality. @Mbz1 you are welcome to vote to oppose for my photo (i.e. noise etc).. and if you don't like all my pictures (noise etc vote also oppose).. but read the FP rules before removing my photos.. and remember that you are not alone in this community. Thanks. Ggia (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment If I reduce the resolution from 36 megapixels to 9 megapixels i.e. like [2] it will have the same quality. Ggia (talk) 18:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment the resolution decreased to 4.000×2.689 pixels to be similar to the resolution of [3] Ggia (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
• please do not remove other editors comments. as you did here .It is a vandalism.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

• •  Comment I just inverted your edit.. my intension was not to remove your comment.. sorry for that.. please be more polite and don't remove other's pictures candidates.. thanks Ggia (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Please read the Commons:Image_guidelines and do not remove my photo. Thanks. Ggia (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, nice composition, but the quality is not nearly enough for FP. Noisy sky, and the image is not sharp.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, it is inside the Commons:Image_guidelines, Mbz1 remove the candidate without mentioning which Image guideline the photograph is missing Ggia (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

You cannot contest it. Somebody else should.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment FPX stands until contested by a support vote. The nominator cannot contest it. Lycaon (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The quality and the educational value are at least as good as many other featured pictures, so FPX is not really justified. Yann (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality not solved by downscaling. Lycaon (talk) 08:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment as I mentioned it is a photo scanned from film (by a film scanner) Ggia (talk) 08:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 23:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose useful for wikipedia articles but per Lycaon --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice scenery, but overexposed, noisy sky, unsharp BG features. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

 Ggia (talk) 08:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)