Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg

File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 12:50:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info all by -- Ralf Roleček
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 12:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice impression. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Request Please add an other license. Only the "GFDL 1.2 only" license isn't enough. New FPC rule. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done --Ralf Roleček 13:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Danke. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, a good idea and a good capture! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support very nice. Ich frage mich, warum du dort mit dem Stativ warst haha. --Kadellar (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Ohne Stativ, Brückengeländer und 4 unscharfe Versuche --Ralf Roleček 14:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Interesting shot and composition but it looks a bit loss details, maybe with f/22? --Laitche (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent. But I ask—what is the message being sent by this picture? That you shouldn't buy a Tesla because it will break down and you'll be stuck on the side of the road while traffic zooms by? Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very intriguing shot. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm slightly concerned regarding the legal situation of this photo. Based on which interpretation do you regard this as being ok? — Julian H.^✈ 10:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Was meinst du? Die Person ist Beiwerk, Nummernschilder brauchen nicht verpixelt werden. --Ralf Roleček 11:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Ich hätte hier stark bezweifelt, dass man sie als Beiwerk bezeichnen kann, aber ich bin natürlich diesbezüglich gar kein Experte. — Julian H.^✈ 11:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Edit: siehe z.B. hier. — Julian H.^✈ 11:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
      • "..daß sie auch entfallen könnten, ohne daß Inhalt und Charakter des Bildes sich veränderten.." ist schon lange gelebter Konsens bei deutschen Gerichten. --Ralf Roleček 12:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
        • @Ralf Roletschek: Hmmm. Ich würde meinen, dass sich der Inhalt und Charakter des Bildes sich ohne diese Person ganz erheblich verändern würde. Mit Person erzählt das Bild eine Geschichte: Sie ist offensichtlich liegengeblieben und ruft nun Hilfe. Das ist mMn genau das, was dieses Bild so gut macht, ohne die Person wäre die Aussage wesentlich schwächer. Ich persönlich hätte dieses Bild genau deswegen sicher nicht hochgeladen. Ist aber letztendlich Dein Risiko … --El Grafo (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 11:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A photograph that leaves the viewer slightly puzzled. I am still annoyed that I find it difficult to see the idea behind the composition - but I prefer "annoying" photos that are able to attract my interest. --Pugilist (talk) 11:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)  Neutral Nice idea and captured but sorry how many times I look at this, the details are lost I guess that with f/22 (this problem). --Laitche (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Code (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Another very good idea, and achievement, for RR.--Jebulon (talk) 19:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good timing with the cars passing by and excellent idea. Eyecatching, and it can serve as an illustration for many kinds of subjects. The motion blur on the passing car naturally draws the attention to the red Tesla and the young lady. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good idea, nice capture. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support good photo --Qian.Nivan (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support For originality Poco² 13:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Poco a Poco. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per Tuxyso.--ArildV (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gildir (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Not a good promotion for Tesla, though. I like the repetition of the wheels in the blurred cars. --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles