Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-393.jpg

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-393.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2015 at 22:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-393.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-393.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Oslo Harbour and City Hall, all by Ralf Roletschek
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 22:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Request @Ralf Roletschek: kannst Du bitte die Hälfte vom Wasser unten wegschneiden? Das zu Viel an Wasser stört den ansonsten schönen Gesamteindruck. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Done beschnitten. --Ralf Roleček 08:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment IMHO the image actually needs the water, for balance, and to show (the certainly blurred) reflections on the water.
•  Support -- KlausFoehl (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Oppose too bottom heavy after crop -- KlausFoehl (talk) 11:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @KlausFoehl: thanks for your opinion, that's not mine. 50% from the water can be croped out without lost any information or balance, but it get more suspense and the foreground view don't drown ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support better now. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice mood. Maybe the WB could be a little more yellow. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Some details could be sharper.--XRay ^talk 09:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 10:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI; not remarkable. -- Colin (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm surprised that this one has so much supporters. I see it as a usual QP as well. -- Pofka (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin and Pofka. --Laitche (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Request @Ralf Roletschek: the image is too sharp, you need to use the new artificial "blur technique" like this: File:Bluebells_ICM,_Ashridge_Estate,_2015.jpg for now. Perhaps Colin can help you!? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Alchemist-hp: Hahaha, very nice, you are kidding! --Laitche (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment no, I'm deadly serious. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
    • How is this blur technique. Far from Colin's image though. --Laitche (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC) I went too far, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 09:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Hey, wow, much better then the "Colin" version :-) :-) :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Man kann zwar nichts mehr erkennen aber schön bunt. Viel besser.

•  Oppose per Pofka --LC-de (talk) 13:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 05:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)