Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:004 2018 05 14 Extremes Wetter.jpg

File:004 2018 05 14 Extremes Wetter.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2019 at 21:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:004 2018 05 14 Extremes Wetter.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:004 2018 05 14 Extremes Wetter.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The resolution is not very big and quite noisy, but wow is there. -- Yann (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I like it, but I'd like to hear from Friedrich Haag on why it's this small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

done, image size now is 13.60 Megapixel, file size is 5 Mpx according to Commons guideline. --F. Riedelio (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

@F. Riedelio: Thanks. There are 2 dust spots on the left. Can you fix that? Yann (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. Fix is done. --F. Riedelio (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Tuxyso (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Conditional support on dust spots being cleaned up. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lightning is always worth seeing. But in this case I do not find the composition outstanding. The level of other lightnings in the according FP category is not reached. --Milseburg (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only light in the darkness, no buildings, no horizon, indistinct tree, I don't find the content very interesting. Compared to other FPs of similar lightnings like File:Port_and_lighthouse_overnight_storm_with_lightning_in_Port-la-Nouvelle.jpg for example, showing some environments, clouds, structures, etc., this one is just empty. But it will certainly become a QI if nominated there -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Not as great as the photo Basile links above, but I like the lines and the image enough to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support There's only one physical object in the entire composition, but the lightning itself is what makes the composition work. Of course it's luck that caused the lightning to travel in a particular path, but regardless for me it is worth a feature. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena