Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:.50 BMG-caliber machine gun ammunition - ID 070628-N-7981E-027.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:.50 BMG-caliber machine gun ammunition - ID 070628-N-7981E-027.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2009 at 14:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by US-Navy - uploaded by D-Kuru - nominated by Diaa abdelmoneim -- Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 14:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great composition with batch of bullets at the front and a soldier preparing the machine gun in the back.-- Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 14:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Inappropriate form for this matter. This is not a packshot of your favorite fruit-tea brand. It should just be informative and technical. This is military gear and this kind of moody, positive-feelings depiction is manipulative. Any suggestion that high caliber machine-gun rounds be used for nice-afternoon walk on the waterfront is supposedly against Balanced approach. --Blago Tebi (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get it, you want the image to contain some blood ?--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Quite the opposite. Read once again. --Blago Tebi (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment, military propaganda pictures have been promoted to FPs numerous times in the past, and I see no reason to make an exception for this picture. --Aqwis (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)- Support Yay, war propaganda. Wolf (talk) 19:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose nothing special --AngMoKio (talk) 11:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support High quality picture of ammunition, regardless of propaganda effect. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 11:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per AngMoKio --Herby talk thyme 11:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Too shallow DOF. —kallerna™ 14:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral It's not inappropriate, I'm regardless of propaganda effect, but I don't like it enought to support for FP --Phyrexian (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I hope this is only because of the absence of wow...--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
