Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg

File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2015 at 04:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Червоні карпатські гори.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info The Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, Zakarpattia Oblast, Ukraine, created by Vian - uploaded by Vian - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Yann (talk) 08:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Laitche (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support WOW --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Color banding in the sky, especially at left, and looks unnatural to me. This is discussible. But what is not is the following: please dear reviewers, be more careful in reviews, how can you support as FP such a picture, with at least 6 very visible dustspots in the sky ???? I'm afraid we need to be more serious in assessing, I recommend, for those who don't know, some stages at the QIC pages...--Jebulon (talk) 11:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Perhaps that banding is caused by jpeg compression, I can remove the banding with Photoshop but when save it as jpeg, the banding appear again. (Tiff is no problem.) --Laitche (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment There is so big wow for me that I didn't noticed the little qualities issues, great and fp even with those qualities issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose This kind of hemisphere-stratosphere border can be seen above 15-20 km, here original curve was moved so far to show up the banding, beside at least 3 smudges in the sky. Main oppose is : its not real. --Mile (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural colors (sky), too pale. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others; unnatural color. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment A pity… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Info I removed many light dustspots and tried to minimize banding problem. Please check and revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

A real improvement, thank you very much Ivar --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment I support (although very weak) my suggested crop. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't want to crop the work of an other photographer and I don't want an alternative too, thanks. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose for a FP, the colors are not realistic enough. --Hubertl 06:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support die farben wirken unnatürlich und genau davon lebt das Bild. Gerade das gefällt mir. Es muß nicht immer alles realistisch sein, wir akzeptieren ja auch Panoramen und HDR. --Ralf Roleček 09:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Exactly the art of photography is a visual art. (genau die Kunst der fotografie ist eine visuelle kunst). Successful here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I love it! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
• I  Support (although very very weak) due to majestic composition. Almost a painting! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The black layer in the top and the purple touch in the clouds make it too unrealistic to me, sorry Poco² 17:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)