Commons:Requests and votes/Alno

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

AlNo for Administrator (closed)

This vote is closed as it appears to be an invalid RfA, please consider my request as cancelled. -- AlNo (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Although I'm not editing very frequently on Commons, I'd like to more some time here for hunting old speedy deletion requests and perform other maintenance task related to copyright issues.
I am also admin on fr: so I now have some experience of what the admin status means :)
I do speak French (native), English (babel-2), Spanish (babel-1) and roughly understand Portuguese.
-- AlNo (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Votes for

  1.  Support Good activity on fr. Plyd 22:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Ok. Sebcaen 06:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
     Support ~Pyb 09:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC) sorry less than 200 edits ~Pyb 09:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support. experimented enough :)  Pabix  09:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support Ok. Valérie75 12:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Votes against

  1. pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Less than 200 edits? Please spend some more time here familiarising yourself with Commons. There are some ideas for administrative tasks that don't require admin status on the talk page. pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree with pfctdayelise. --EugeneZelenko 14:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NielsF 22:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC). This RfA should be closed ASAP because the candidate doesn't meet the requirements as stated on COM:ADMIN#What_is_expected_from_an_administrator.3F and this RfA is therefore not valid.[reply]
  4. As above. Why are we voting in the first place? An admin should close this vote. --Tarawneh 02:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose, 11 Template edits and 4 Commons edits is not enough. --Kjetil_r 08:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion