User talk:AaronY/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Dominik Hasek.jpg[edit]

Done. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr[edit]

Hi Quadzilla! Have you heard about our Flickr group? You're welcome to join. :) cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Quadzilla99 09:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael jordan statue 2.jpg[edit]

Hi Quadzilla99. When an image is deleted as a copyvio, one does not upload it again. Kjetil_r 00:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When it's an apparent mistake "one" does. It's a publicly displayed statue and the photo is listed under creative commons-attribution license. Explain to me how this is a copyvio. Quadzilla99 10:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This image is a derivative work: The artist who made the sculpture own the copyrights of it. This means that if you make a picture of it, you create a derivative work. So you need explicit permission from the sculpturer to release this image under some license, especially since freedom of panorama does not exist in the USA. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Images in Category:Frank Gehry largely depends on the country the picture was taken: The Netherlands has an almost full freedom of panorama, while Japan only a noncommercial one, and the USA hasn't even one. I cannot answer this question fully, because I am also largely unknown with this subject. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Image:Billy Corgan pic.jpg[edit]

Where exactly is the redundant copy on Commons? I know there is one saved locally on Wikipedia. Thanks. Zzyzx11 04:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Taylor mugshot[edit]

Hi Quadzilla. On Image:Ltaylormug.jpg, you said "It's a photo released by the Myrtle Beach police department whose mugshots are by default public domain." The Myrtle Beach PD is not part of the U.S. federal government, so it's not obvious why this is the case. Unless you have any specific info about the local policies, I don't think it is safe for us to assume that the photo is PD and suitable for Commons. Note that {{PD-US-mugshot}} and similar templates now redirect to {{Copyvio}}. Discussion about the issue has been pretty fragmented, but one part is here. ×Meegs 15:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg[edit]

You previously voted in the FP candidacy of Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. This image has now been nominated for removal of its FP status. If you have not already done so, you might like to join the discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. I'm notifying both pro and anti-voters. --MichaelMaggs 16:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Pippen[edit]

It would be helpful to give me a link to the file.

Also, please note that "Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. This means that you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license."[1]. So if you definitely saw that the flickr user had marked the image with a CC license at the time that you copied it to Commons, I do not see a reason to delete it. Zzyzx11 23:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hello,

Non-derivative and non-commercial pictures are not allowed on Commons. Please check the licence before uploading. Also you cannot change the licence of the file. Regards, Yann 12:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the following:

Hello,

If the photographer agrees to publish these under a licence accepted on Commons, please send a copy of this mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I will undelete your images. Regards, Yann 17:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fine. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Yann 17:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also corrected the link for 3 images. Regards, Yann 17:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary: Basically this whole thing was a misunderstanding/mistake. The important thing is that I managed to convince a flickr user to release a ton of pics she took of Michael Jordan to Commons. They have all been reviewed by an admin and are now in like Flynn. Thanks to sghmom56's generosity we now have a ton of MJ pics whereas a couple of months ago we had to use a wax sculpture (seriously) in his infobox over on Wikipedia. See my user page to see how to thank her, you could always thank me too for scouring the internet and asking tons of photographers if we could use their pics of MJ too. I mean she was only the 40th photographer I had to ask to get some more. Ya know, I'm just saying. Quadzilla99 02:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr[edit]

Quadzilla99, when uploading pictures from Flickr use this infobox: 

{{Flickr
|description={{en|[[:en:Bruce Springsteen|Bruce Springsteen]] of [[w:Green Day|Green Day]].}}
|flickr_url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/sis/10175721/
|title=Bruce
|taken=20/APR/2005
|photographer_url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/sis/
|photographer=Jackie 
|photographer_location=  Monmouth County, NJ, USA  
|reviewer=Dantadd
|Permission= {{cc-by-2.0}}
{{flickrreview}}
}}


Thank you, Dantadd✉ 01:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can add the template to your monobook, but it can only be used when editing, after the first upload. I particularly have a .rtf file with all useful templates and I use them applying the old CTRL C/CTRC V method. This template eases the work of the reviewers and establishes a pattern in all Flickr pictures. You're invited to use it, a lot of people would appreciate it, me included. Thanks, Dantadd✉ 13:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jabbar&Wooden.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Jabbar&Wooden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Husky talk to me 23:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I commented there. Pic is derivative I didn't realize it when it was uploaded, feel free to have it nuked. Quadzilla99 02:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Clemens pic[edit]

I didn't know that was you who asked at flickr. I also didn't know if you had seen all that (the getty remark) and that question before you uploaded, so I figured better safe than sorry. It appears you questioned it, but still uploaded it which probably wasn't the right path, but in the end, it's all sorted out so no big deal. I apologize if I offended you (since you appear to be an established user at commons) by the notice. --MECU≈talk 19:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Cheechoo pic[edit]

I changed the info on the Jonathan Cheechoo pic so that it links to my Commons account rather than the Flickr account ("The BH" is me). An uncropped version of that pic was already on Commons. Just thought I'd let you know, in case you wonder why I changed the info. Buchanan-Hermit 08:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I was just lucky enough to be there with my camera. Scott Niedermayer signed my jersey that day too, as I was the only visible Ducks fan present. It was great. :) Buchanan-Hermit 19:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

thank you :-) Nikita 20:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Walker[edit]

No, if the images are slightly different, we can keep both, as they may fulfill someone's needs. Plus, then they're not really duplicated. It's okay to have two or more images of the same thing/person if they're different and free. MECU≈talk 13:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trusted user box[edit]

I've been bold and put it on your user page :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thorpe pic[edit]

I asked Editor at Large to crop the picture, she has uploaded it as Image:Ian Thorpe on a plane cropped.jpg. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Colman[edit]

Huh, that's odd. I could have sworn it was CC. Oh well. I also uploaded Image:PeterFurler.jpg from the same guy, so you may want to tag that one for deletion too. ShadowHalo 16:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hakeemsigningautocropped.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hakeemsigningautocropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Denniss (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tambor Dynasty II.jpg[edit]

File:Tambor Dynasty II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Karppinen (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teacher_writing_on_a_Blackboard.jpg[edit]

File:Teacher_writing_on_a_Blackboard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ltaylormug.jpg[edit]

File:Ltaylormug.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

UserB (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AaronY/Archive1&oldid=59428128"