User talk:Kes47

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:KES47)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KES47!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kes47!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please experiment in the sandbox[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−
float 
An edit you made to Copán, Honduras seemed to be a test, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Feel free to visit the community portal if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thank you!

you have already create the Category:Copán, Honduras so this empty page is unused. Regards, Otourly (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that's ok. Only administrators could delete file on Commons. I couldn't imagine what commons would be if everybody could do that :) Otourly (talk) 07:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage[edit]

Hi, on your User page User:KES47 you could add some information about your spoken langages as {{babel|User fr|user en-2}} etc please see Commons:Babel for more information. Regards, Otourly (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rayleigh sunlight scattering.svg[edit]

You can't take a GFDL/CC-BY-SA image and make a Public Domain copy, like you did with File:Rayleigh sunlight scattering.svg. Please correct the licensing or your version will have to be deleted. Dragons flight (talk) 18:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rayleigh sunlight scattering.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Dragons flight (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Akinator.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KES47, I noticed that you overwrote the image with a different version. Many of my images are used in more than one project and are drawn the way they are on purpose. I would prefer if you uploaded the changed image with another filename, rather than overwriting the existing image. It's no problem to have multiple images for the same chemical compound. Regards, --NEURO  08:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Uracil tautomers.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Uracil tautomers.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 19:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:O6metilguanina.svg[edit]

Can you please have a second look at File:O6metilguanina.svg. There is now a double bond missing in the righthand ring. Compare with File:6-O-Methylguanine.png. Thank you. Ed (Edgar181) 18:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The letters in –OCH3 have a slightly different size, the “3” has a different font type. Could you please fix this? --Leyo 07:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Trimyristin.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Trimyristin.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 12:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The quality of the chemical structure File:Nicotinic-acid.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Nicotinic-acid.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 15:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Nicotinic-acid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 06:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would either you or User:AnonMoos be able to add border lines to the West Africa coastal area, and extend the border lines to the coast? I added South Sudan, but am not well equipped to draw lines. Delphi234 (talk) 02:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KES47, could you please redraw the diagram without interpolation lines? We are having a discussion (in german) about the diagram at de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Chemie#Alkane, if you want to give your opinion (in english), you are very welcome. Basically: There is no alkane between propane and butane (and the others, too), so a line between the dots is inaccurate. --Nothingserious (talk) 15:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Nothingserious (talk) 08:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Badjpeg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

nyuszika7h (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Luis Zelaya.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luis Zelaya.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Taichi (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Please edit your signature so it links to User:Kes47 rather than User:KES47. SignBot doesn't recognize the all-caps name as your signature, so it does [1]. Guanaco (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a quite massive 1114 bytes, including timestamp.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't add files that obviously do not have a copyright problem to the Images without source problem category. Jcb (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Font samples for £ sign?[edit]

If you have the time and opportunity, I wonder if you might create a sampler of pound signs equivalent to Moreeurofonts.svg? Ideally, it would include an example with two bars, like Bodoni MT Black (which is the only font I can find that does this - hardly surprising as it is an obsolete form). But only if it is trivial to do. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per my talk page, thank you again. It is now live at en:wiki:pound sign under #Historioc variants. When you have time, would you take a look and let me know if you are content with how I have done the attribution, please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And now that you are on a roll, $ sign[edit]

WANTED, but not a double bar $

There has been a lot of work in the last few days at en.wiki on a currency sign template. So if you are feeling really generous, could you do another font sampler for the dollar sign, that has both the one vertical bar and two vertical bar versions. I guess you might know about the Cifrão, which Unicode declared is just an allograph, so that is the reason to need it. Four samples would be adequate, I don't want to push my luck. Just so long as it includes a WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE poster font :-) I think I can hear Clint Eastwood whistling in the distance. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found a Wanted poster on Commons but it doesn't have a two-bar dollar, despite "everybody knows" that they did. Circuses, perhaps? Snake-oil salesmen? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:32, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again, thank you. The image is now live at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_sign and looks great. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

I received yout message. What are you looking for? --Urbanuntil (talk) 03:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deje de lloriquear Buddy, tuvo la suerte de re-subir la bandera hondureña, ahora quítese. Tenga cuidado, por cierto. --Urbanuntil (talk) 07:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
¡JAJAJA!, estoy tranquilo y además nadie habló de sometimientos. A ver quien te pela hermano. --Urbanuntil (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dejo tu banderita, el trabajo lo harán otros. --Urbanuntil (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kes47, I was looking to find the correct colors for digital display for the Honduran flag and stumbled over your edit war with user Urbanuntil. To me it looks like neither of you two gave any sources for the choice of colors that I can see. However, I think the dispute around https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Honduras_(Pantone).svg may be based on a misunderstanding. As the title of the file says, this file is the version with pantone colors. This file is for the flag with colors for the digital version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Honduras.svg There is also a lengthy civilized discussion about the correct choice of colors. If the color Urbanuntil set on the flag was indeed the correct pantone color of the Honduras flag, his color choice should be used. However, the question is why the pantone version is linked from the wiki page at all and not the File:Flag_of_Honduras.svg version. -- Westnordost (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Honduras market during COVID-19 pandemic.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Honduras market during COVID-19 pandemic.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Honduras market during COVID-19 pandemic.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Honduras market during COVID-19 pandemic.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti Berta Tegucigalpa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:PINU-SD.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 12:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricardo 8 D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jakob990 (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Stadium entrance (Honduras).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]