Talk:भारत / India

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Talk:India)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Title[edit]

Moved to proper language (Hindi being administrative official) article title. gren 09:02, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This should be about functionality. Almost nobody (amend that: nobody, period) out there is typing "Bharat" in Devanagari script when looking for India. Wikipedia is not governed by the Indian constitution and I have therefore been bold, redirected back to "India" and repaired double redirects. Long overdue, IMO. Regards, ImpuMozhi 02:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why was this moved without discussion? It is not a question of constitution, it is an issue that names of galleries of countries should be in native names when possible. India does not belong to the English-speaking world, and commons (in difference to say en.wikipedia.org) is a multilingual wiki. Bharat is the name used officially in all indian languages, and devanagari is by far the most widely used script in India. --Soman 12:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is not an Indian site. It is used by worldwide users, most who are not Indian and do not refer to the nation as Bharat.Indianhilbilly 22:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately this is not an English site either, and the policy here is that we use the native name when it's possible. Non-Indian users will find the page through redirects, so there's no problem about functionality. I'll be bold and re-rename it. Aaker 00:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would Hindi be considered the proper language of India? Many would disagree. I suggest to move this article back to India, we can provide all 22 regional languages inside java script.

Thanks --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 20:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Indian languages in headers[edit]

Hi, I don't think adding Indian languages in headers is a good solution. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping: @Dineshkumar Ponnusamy:
I agree with you Yann, but if I would have said it at first point then there is a chance that people will come up with other invalid points, in order to avoid that I did this. Thanks for understanding it. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 06:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]