File talk:Wiki-anal missionary.png

I'm fairly sure it's physically impossible for this man's penis to be attached.... Generally the penis would go through the center of the buttocks. In this image, it's far lower. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I consider this image as highly inapropriate. It is not acceptable that the passive partner has long hair while the active partner has short hair. Tis straightens prejudices! Also I think that it is not tolerable to show this image an the sex article. Oral sex is Sex too and should be also shown.

Непристойно

Какая мерзость

Skin tones - revert?

I think the version with contrasting skintones (reverted, "unnecessary changes") is indeed easier to read visually. Also, regardless of the artist's intentions, it's a grain of sand that seems to spouse the idea of white skin as the default. Two birds, one stone?

Miyo0i (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)