File talk:Visa requirements for Myanmar citizens.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Myanmar voa and evisa together[edit]
Do you insist on using the same color for VoA and eVisa for Myanmar citizens unlike in any other map just to cause another scandal or you actually have a rationale?--Twofortnights (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think my edit is appropriate and brings contribution for this file. However, I have no time to check each record for burma so I put voa and evisa together. If you know more details, you are welcomed to add them. But it's not a wise choice for you to just simply revert it or you are causing "scandal", not me.--Whisper of the heart (talk) 10:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- If you don't have time to make a proper edit then don't do it. Your version is wrong, no other map combines visa on arrival and evisa as those are two different things.--Twofortnights (talk) 11:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- My version is not perfect but correct, constructive and fit all Wikimedia Commons policies, so it shouldn't be reverted. Also, maps such as File:Visa requirements for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines citizens.png which are edited by you combine these two things together, do you want to revert all of them? Or why you just revert my edit regardless yours? Your double standard is toooooooo obvious.--Whisper of the heart (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- The only obvious thing is that you enjoy making these scandals over and over again. Electronic visa and visa on arrival are completely different. The end of story.
- As for the File:Visa requirements for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines citizens.png map, it has no legend at all so I am not sure what are you talking about? The one on Wikipedia? I just fixed it.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- After your "fix", map readers will think Turkey as a visa on arrival country but actually it doesn't, you are making even more mistake. Mixing visa on arrival and e-visa is a imperfect but not bad option. However, ignoring the existence of e-visa is a complete mistake, that's why I make improvement here. So far nobody is making "scandals" here, but it looks like in your mind, everyone other than you are making "scandals", so you choose to stop them by making some scandals by yourself.--Whisper of the heart (talk) 04:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Just add another color for electronic visas and the problem is solved.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- My edit doesn't violate any policy and it's completely contructive, so I don't think I have to follow your command. Once more, if you think any other actions can make this file better, then just do it by yourself, you'd better never expect other people treat you like a king. --Whisper of the heart (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Just add another color for electronic visas and the problem is solved.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- After your "fix", map readers will think Turkey as a visa on arrival country but actually it doesn't, you are making even more mistake. Mixing visa on arrival and e-visa is a imperfect but not bad option. However, ignoring the existence of e-visa is a complete mistake, that's why I make improvement here. So far nobody is making "scandals" here, but it looks like in your mind, everyone other than you are making "scandals", so you choose to stop them by making some scandals by yourself.--Whisper of the heart (talk) 04:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- My version is not perfect but correct, constructive and fit all Wikimedia Commons policies, so it shouldn't be reverted. Also, maps such as File:Visa requirements for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines citizens.png which are edited by you combine these two things together, do you want to revert all of them? Or why you just revert my edit regardless yours? Your double standard is toooooooo obvious.--Whisper of the heart (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- If you don't have time to make a proper edit then don't do it. Your version is wrong, no other map combines visa on arrival and evisa as those are two different things.--Twofortnights (talk) 11:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
