File talk:Philippsburg2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
{{delete|reason=in the source it's a NC-license|subpage=File:Philippsburg2.jpg|year=2020|month=May|day=14}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.144.208.71 (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed: https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023123/https://ka.stadtwiki.net/Datei:Philippsburg2.jpg --Achim (talk) 11:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- According to the permission field in the Information template, the author agreed to "relicense it for Wikipedia". It also has a link to the author's talk page on the source wiki. I can't paste the contents of the discussion here since the wiki is CC-BY-NC-SA, but if Google Translate is right, the author allowed ikar.us to use any license accepted by Wikipedia (actually Wikimedia Commons, but whatever). So it seems this file is dual-licensed under both CC-BY-SA-2.5 and CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5, which is weird, but acceptable regardless. pandakekok9 11:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Author agreed: https://ka.stadtwiki.net/Benutzer_Diskussion:Lothar#KKP. So nothing to do here :). --Achim (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- According to the permission field in the Information template, the author agreed to "relicense it for Wikipedia". It also has a link to the author's talk page on the source wiki. I can't paste the contents of the discussion here since the wiki is CC-BY-NC-SA, but if Google Translate is right, the author allowed ikar.us to use any license accepted by Wikipedia (actually Wikimedia Commons, but whatever). So it seems this file is dual-licensed under both CC-BY-SA-2.5 and CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5, which is weird, but acceptable regardless. pandakekok9 11:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
