File talk:New old Tibet.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fantasy map[edit]

There are big problems with this map. The source is not historical but an independentist political site. with map of East Turkestan, word that appear with russian and english colonisation in 19th century, not 16th century. There was even no unity in central Tibet, with wars between en:Ü and en:Tsang, with en:Ngari that was then the en:Guge kingom, and en:Kham was mostly a en:Tusi, the en:Kingdom of Derge and en:Kokonor/en:Amdo not included too as there was not unified Tibet. Popolon (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]