File talk:Map Iberian Peninsula 1030-es.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This map is entirely wrong. There is a significant number of taifa kingdoms missing that already existed in 1030 and which are proprerly referenced in their respective articles in wikipedia Spanish. --Té y kriptonita (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Té y kriptonita if you are an expert on this topic you could make a suggestion to draw a new map or improve this one in the Commons:Graphic_Lab. Greetings --Furfur (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This map chronologically is not of 1030 but of 1064 because Ferdinand I of Leon conquered Coimbra at that year. In 1030 there were some muslims kingdoms like Mértola in current Portugal that disappeared after conquest by Aftasi king of Badajoz. Viseu and Lamego were not conquered until 1055 and 1054, so it's absolutely wrong to indicate 1030 as the year of this map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeixasPT (talk • contribs) 06:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info Furfur, there are actually several othe versions of that map in commons. --Té y kriptonita (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you be so kind as to point us to them, please? --Jerome Potts (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


¿Porqué en el Reino de León no sale marcada su capital o sede real, la ciudad de León?

Curiosidad[edit]

Resuslta curioso que los mas o menos 2 años en que los condados Castellanos estuvieron en poder de navarra, sea el mapa que se utilice siempre para ilustrar el mapa de la España medieval.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.72.181 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 27 oct 2013‎ (UTC) (UTC)

Hombre, esos "2 años" que le atribuyes van desde el 994 hasta el 1065 (69 años), sin olvidar que desde 1028, el conde por derecho fue navarro y que la conversión en reino será con Fernando I, que era también navarro. - Lector d Wiki Zer? 12:11 28 jun 2014 (UTC)