File talk:Dardania kingdom.png

This is not a source, its a pot-pouri site http://albaniaonline.org/the-dardanian-kingdom/Megistias (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

It is a presentation of an book and it is a source that term "Dardanian kingdom" is used as such. PANONIAN (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Not a source, and thus shows the quality of your creationMegistias (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Not a source according to whom? Please be serious. Post some valid proof against something not just your rethorical statements. PANONIAN (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you even communicating? That site is not a book written by a historian nor a university aknowledged by the academic world. Its nothing.Megistias (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

You just repeating your personal opinions over and over, do you? This is clear question: who claim that this book is not reliable source and because of which reason? We cannot just accept your personal opinion without valid and sourced background. PANONIAN (talk) 17:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

This is a website, http://albaniaonline.org/the-dardanian-kingdom/ not a book.Megistias (talk) 11:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is web site that contains a presentation of a book named "Dardanian kingdom", so what is a problem? PANONIAN (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You are not communicating on any level. WP:rs clearly states that such things are not proper sources.You have not read it even once in your life since you have been doing such things all over commons.Megistias (talk) 13:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I did not used that web page as primary source. My sources are history books, while this web page was included into reference list only to illustrate that there are other sources about the subject. However, seems that this link does not work anymore anyway, so I will remove it from reference list. PANONIAN (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)