File:Top advice researchers would give someone reading (a) scientific paper(s) for the first time.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,568 × 1,423 pixels, file size: 106 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Captions

Captions

(students) From the study "Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage"

Summary[edit]

Description
English: "Thematic analysis of advice researchers gave to someone reading a scientific paper for the first time"

"Experienced researchers recommend a selective approach to scientific reading"

"A more detailed qualitative analysis of the responses identified four major themes of the advice; reading selectively within a paper, practical suggestions for reading the paper, reading critically and reading with a specific purpose or question in mind (Table 1). 60 of the 88 participants recommended selective reading, with 28 researchers advising reading the paper in a specific order. There was no clear consensus within the responses of which order the sections of a paper should be prioritised in, although starting with the abstract (n = 16) and figures (n = 6) were the most common suggestions. Some researchers recommended reading the abstract, then looking at the figures then reading the text, while others recommended starting with the abstract, then reading the introduction and discussion before looking at the figures. Some recommended prioritising particular sections of the paper (e.g. figures, n = 7) without giving specific instructions on which order the paper should be read in. Others did not make reference to particular sections, but gave more general advice such as identifying the key questions or hypotheses of the paper (n = 8). Some survey participants recommended ignoring the methods section of the paper altogether (n = 3)."

"A pilot survey of both students and researchers was designed to answer the following lines of enquiry for both students and researchers:

  • How frequently did participants read scientific papers?
  • How did participants feel about reading scientific papers?
  • How easy to read did participants find different sections of papers?
  • How important did participants think different sections of papers were?
  • [Students only] How much training had they had in reading papers?
  • [Researchers only] What advice would they give to someone reading a paper for the first time."
Note that what is referred to could be most common approach which can deviate heavily per case or e.g. depending on purpose. This is basically a list of tips of things that are often useful to apply when reading papers.
Date
Source https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189753
Author Authors of the study: Katharine E. Hubbard, Sonja D. Dunbar

Licensing[edit]

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:12, 11 September 2023Thumbnail for version as of 21:12, 11 September 20231,568 × 1,423 (106 KB)Prototyperspective (talk | contribs)Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Katharine E. Hubbard, Sonja D. Dunbar from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189753 with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata