File:TheFamilyDoctorNov2 1889page154.png

Summary[edit]

--:0:--

CORSETS FOR MEN

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FAMILY DOCTOR.

SIR,-I think your correspondent Mr. Pratt will have to go further back in the page of history than the time of Francis 1. of France in order to find the origin of tight corsets. or even of the all-potent busk, which he so much objects to. A reference to your back numbers will settle this point; but I am not quite clear as to the fact of wearing stays constituting a man" an effeminate dandy." The example which he has chosen is singularly unfortunate. Bulwer Lytton was a fine all-round specimen of humanity, whether he wore stays or not; and if he ever could have had occasion to try conclusions with " dear, dirty Tennyson," I am not at all sure that he would have got the worst of it. As well might your correspondent sneer at Shakespeare or Julius Cæsar because they chose to wear earrings, and merely because in England it has ceased to be a national custom.

As for the supposed cruelty of subjecting children to the discipline of the corset, in the hands of proper persons it is the mildest and most easily graduated means of reformation ever introduced, and may well replace the present hypocritical and ineffectual systems.--I am, Sir, your obedient servant,

B. N. SERRE.

Queen Victoria-street, London, E C.,

Oct. 9, 1889.

BACKBOARDS AND COLLARS.

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FAMILY DOCTOR.

SIR.--I have perused the letter by "Carl" in last week's number (in reply to mine) with some interest and no little surprise, as I was not aware the backboards and collars he refers to were still in vogue. I did not advocate such strong measures, and think his treatment is rather too severe. Will he allow me to ask him one or two queries ?

First, in his otherwise elaborate description of the apparatus employed on his daughters he does not say what the " collar" consists of. Is it made of steel, too, and does it encircle the throat or the chin only ? If the latter, is the head fixed immovably when it is raised ? In that case it must be decidedly uncomfortable, if not injurious. Then, is not the use of the "long backboard" superfluous when the other appliances are worn ? I would also remark that to make young girls stand for two hours in stocks in the evening after a fatiguing day with their feet (as I imagine) in a straight line, and their arms extended full length, must be a serious strain on their muscles, and is much too severe. Would it not be better to let them sit for part of the time ? Lastly, I gather from his description that these metal backboards and straps are never removed all day, so that his unfortunate children never have the free use of their limbs. (Query--Do they wear them on Sundays ?) Besides being very unnatural, this must weaken the muscles of the back and neck very materially. I am curious to know what other appliances I, Carl's" wife uses on her children, but I can quite understand that " their feelings are not consulted." I wonder, indeed, they do not rebel sometimes, and it is evident they are not willing sufferers, or it would be unnecessary to have so many locks and straps as are referred to.

Trusting that" Carl " may be able to remove some of my apprehensions,--I am, &c.,

Oct. I, 1889. OLD FASHIONED.

Licensing[edit]

This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information). This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details. {{PD-Art}} template without license parameter: please specify why the underlying work is public domain in both the source country and the United States (Usage: {{PD-Art|1=|deathyear=''year of author's death''|country=''source country''}}, where parameter 1= can be PD-old-auto, PD-old-auto-expired, PD-old-auto-1996, PD-old-100 or similar. See Commons:Multi-license copyright tags for more information.)