File:Percentage of Sub-Saharan Africa invertebrates, plants, reptiles, mammals that have gone Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, likely Extinct since the year 1500.png
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 524 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 210 pixels | 640 × 420 pixels | 1,103 × 723 pixels.
Original file (1,103 × 723 pixels, file size: 99 KB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionPercentage of Sub-Saharan Africa invertebrates, plants, reptiles, mammals that have gone Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, likely Extinct since the year 1500.png | Original description, according to the source, p. 260: "Figure 8.2 Percentage of Sub-Saharan Africa invertebrates, plants, reptiles, and mammals that have gone Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, and likely Extinct since the year 1500. Dashed line represents the natural rate of extinctions expected without human influences. After Ceballos et al., 2015, CC BY 4.0." Context in the source, page 159f: "If extinction and speciation are natural processes, an obvious question follows: “Why should we care about the loss of biodiversity?” The answer concerns not individual species extinctions as much as the increasing rate of these extinctions (Figure 8.2). While a species can be wiped off Earth over a relatively short period of time, speciation typically occurs slowly as the genetic makeup of a population shifts over thousands of years. Unfortunately, we are currently losing species 1,000 times faster than natural background extinction rates (for mammals estimated to be 1.8 extinctions per 10,000 species per 100 years, Barnosky et al., 2011), and future rates may be 10,000 times higher that background rates (de Vos et al., 2015). Because over 99% of current species extinctions have been linked to human activity rather than natural processes (Pimm et al., 2014), observations on past extinctions and subsequent speciation may not apply to the present. Moreover, unlike before, humans now share the planet with the species we are wiping out. These losses mean that we are also losing the benefits we gain from nature (Chapter 4) at unprecedented rates." |
Date | |
Source | John W. Wilson, Richard B. Primack: "Conservation Biology in Sub-Saharan Africa", Chapter 8: "Extinction Is Forever", Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK, 2019, ISBN: 978-1-78374-751-1, pp. 257–296, here p. 260, Figure 8.2, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0177, License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Original URL of the image: https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0177/image/Fig_8.2.png |
Author | After Ceballos et al., 2015, CC BY 4.0. (Ceballos, G., P.R. Ehrlich, A.D. Barnosky, et al. 2015. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances 1: e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253) |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:49, 26 December 2023 | 1,103 × 723 (99 KB) | Anglo-Araneophilus (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description=Original description, according to the source, p. 260: "Figure 8.2 Percentage of Sub-Saharan Africa invertebrates, plants, reptiles, and mammals that have gone Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, and likely Extinct since the year 1500. Dashed line represents the natural rate of extinctions expected without human influences. After Ceballos et al., 2015, CC BY 4.0." Context in the source, page 159f: "If extinction and speciation are natural processes, an obvious question fo... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on de.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 107.48 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 107.48 dpc |