File:Different sections of scientific papers are considered easy to read and important at different stages of academic careers (Methods and Results sections the most difficult to understand).png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(2,940 × 1,101 pixels, file size: 569 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Captions

Captions

From the study "Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage"

Summary[edit]

Description
English: "A: The proportion of participants considering a section easy to read (presented as ‘Somewhat easy’, ‘easy’ ‘very easy’ combined) as a function of career stage. Results of Chi-square tests are indicated on the left hand side. B: The mean importance rank of sections as a function of career stage. Error bars are omitted from individual points for clarity, with the sole error bar in grey representing the largest 95% confidence interval for any of the data points. Asterisks above data points indicate significant differences in response compared with the previous career stage as determined by Mann-Whitney post-hoc tests. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189753.g002"
Date
Source https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189753
Author Authors of the study: Katharine E. Hubbard, Sonja D. Dunbar

Licensing[edit]

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:12, 11 September 2023Thumbnail for version as of 21:12, 11 September 20232,940 × 1,101 (569 KB)Prototyperspective (talk | contribs)Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Katharine E. Hubbard, Sonja D. Dunbar from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189753 with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata