File:Capabilities for detecting technosignatures with recent, ongoing, and future missions and facilities.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 375 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 150 pixels | 640 × 300 pixels | 1,024 × 480 pixels | 1,280 × 600 pixels | 2,833 × 1,327 pixels.
Original file (2,833 × 1,327 pixels, file size: 383 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
From the study "Searching for technosignatures in exoplanetary systems with current and future missions"
Summary[edit]
| Description |
English: "Capabilities for detecting technosignatures with recent, ongoing, and future missions and facilities. Cells colored green indicate there is at least one stellar system where the given technosignature could be detectable with the mission or observatory. A green cell further indicates there is a peer-reviewed publication that has evaluated the hypothetical detectability of that technosignature. A yellow cell indicates the potential detectability of that technosignature in at least one stellar system, but that further study is needed. A red cell indicates that the given technosignature is not detectable with that observatory or mission architecture for any stellar systems. Note that we include all ground-based instrumentation in the ground-based photometry and ground-based spectroscopy categories, although specific observatory-instrument combinations may only access a subset of indicated technosignatures. For example, the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) could plausibly detect optical beacons [79], but no other indicated technosignatures. See text accompanying Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 for more specific examples of current, future, or potential ground-based facilities capable of detecting the indicated technosignatures. Examples are meant to be illustrative rather than exhaustive, and focus on missions or facilities with the capability of characterizing terrestrial planets. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)" |
| Date | |
| Source | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576522002594 |
| Author | Authors of the study: Jacob Haqq-Misraa, Edward W. Schwieterman, Hector Socas-Navarro, Ravi Kopparapu, Daniel Angerhausen, Thomas G. Beatty, Svetlana Berdyugina, Ryan Felton, Siddhant Sharmaa, Gabriel G. De la Torre, Dániel Apai, TechnoClimes 2020 workshop participants |
Licensing[edit]
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 22:36, 28 July 2022 | | 2,833 × 1,327 (383 KB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Jacob Haqq-Misraa, Edward W. Schwieterman, Hector Socas-Navarro, Ravi Kopparapu, Daniel Angerhausen, Thomas G. Beatty, Svetlana Berdyugina, Ryan Felton, Siddhant Sharmaa, Gabriel G. De la Torre, Dániel Apai, TechnoClimes 2020 workshop participants from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576522002594 with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
