Commons:Valued image candidates/Surinam toad (DFdB).jpg

Surinam toad (DFdB).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Dein Freund der Baum (talk) on 2010-01-22 17:08 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Pipa pipa (Surinam toad)
Used in	Global usage en:Surinam toad; de:Große Wabenkröte; sv:Pipagroda
Review (criteria)	Comment about scope: "General rule is: one scope per species, in the form: "official latin name (vernacular name, if applicable)", see Commons:Valued image scope#Animals for further details. --Myrabella (talk) 08:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment I suggest that the scope be changed by Pipa pipa --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC) or more precisely: "Pipa pipa (Surinam toad)", assuming that the ID is correct (I trust Archaeodontosaurus :-).--Myrabella (talk) 09:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry, I only know the genus. It said in German "Weibliche Wabenkröte" on the sign, which means female en:Surinam toad or en:pipa, as far as I'm concerned. I thought the picture would be very useful for all species of pipa although we don't know the exactly species because you can see the eggs and hatching animals on the back of the toad. Does someone know whether the toad on this picture is a en:Pipa pipa? Regards, --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC) What about Female Pipa or Female Pipa with embedded eggs in the back skin or something similar (I know it's no species but it would be similar to If male and female of the same species can be distinguished from each other from a picture, then a "male" scope and a "female" scope can be proposed for the same species. and Subscopes are often relevant to a higher taxonomy level, in which case the precise species is not to be included in the scope. For instance there is a Valued Image for the scope "head of a fly", which basically illustrates the head of any kind of fly.)? Regards, --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 20:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)  Support Best picture on the scope. Geocode impossible, very useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Myrabella (talk) 08:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)