Question You mentioned that there river here is in a high-water period, and I notice that this image shows a small separate fall to the left of the main fall, which does not appear in our other two photographs of this. I assume the separate fall is because of the high water, but I'm concerned that as a result, this image may depict an atypical appearance of the waterfall. Do you have any information about the degree to which the water was high (was it a normal seasonal variance or an exceptional flood?) and the frequency with which the second waterfall occurs? If this is not an atypical appearance for the waterfall, I will support. cmadler (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the separate fall is probably because of the high water but I don't think this is something atypical. I would say that something is atypical if it can be seen once per a few decades. This picture shows something typical for every year, I suppose.--MrPanyGoff15:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
