Commons:Valued image candidates/Prime Minister David Cameron - official photograph (8947770804) (cropped).jpg

Prime Minister David Cameron - official photograph (8947770804) (cropped).jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) on 2021-05-10 17:15 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: David Cameron in 2010, portrait photography
Used in	Global usage en:David Cameron
Reason	Best-quality 2010 image of Mr Cameron on the Commons. -- ᴀlbanɢeller (talk)
Review (criteria)	So again, is the year relevant to the scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: I'll change it to David Cameron, if that's alright with you? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Please pick a single scope linked to a single Commons category - either official portraits of him or just portraits of him. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)  Done ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Please delink "portrait photograph" from Wikipedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)  Done ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)  Question So you're keeping the year as relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC) No, I've removed it. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment OK, having looked through all photos that could be considered portraits of Cameron (or at least the great majority - I neglected some subcategories of his trips to x, y and z), I think File:Ministru prezidenta Valda Dombrovska tikšanās ar Apvienotās Karalistes Ministru prezidentu Deividu Kameronu (8514463969).jpg is best in scope. Why is that not the case? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment Or the cropped version of that is File:David Cameron portrait (cropped).jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC) I'll change it back and amend my reason for nominating. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Scope changed from David Cameron, portrait photography to David Cameron in 2010, portrait photography --ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". @Ikan Kekek: I believe this image is the best depiction of him from 2010. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 00:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Oppose scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC) What exactly is the issue with the scope? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Imagine an actor with a 60-year career. Should we have 60 VIs of that actor, one for every year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Archaeodontosaurus writes, "For public persons who have a large number of photographs, the year of shooting must be added, and the image must be attached to the category that contains it." ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment I don't have to agree with him. If he disagrees, he's free to support this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment The idea I came up with works for famous people with a limited number of images (ideally deceased people). For the "living" the idea is too difficult to apply. But the image that is proposed to us is good, we must find a scope or promote it under the sole name of the subject.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)