Commons:Valued image candidates/Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 27.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 27.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Ikan Kekek (talk) on 2017-05-15 11:53 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gate of All Nations in Persepolis, Frontal view
Used in Global usage
Reason There is currently no VI of this very important relic of Persepolis. I think you'll agree that this is the best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
Review
(criteria)

 Comment I think scope should include Persépolis. Better change Category:Gate of All Nations to Gate of All Nations, Persepolis, frontal view Charles (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why, considering where the category link goes? What would happen when people look for a VI in Category:Persepolis after this is a VI? Wouldn't this photo come up? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Category:Gate of All Nations, Frontal view to Gate of All Nations in Persepolis, Frontal view --Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

  •  Comment - I still don't really see why this change is necessary, and please sign your post above. However, I don't want to waste time just to make an unimportant point, and it doesn't actually hurt to add the parent category to the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Thanks. Charles (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. And you may be right that this scope is more user-friendly. It couldn't hurt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]